Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

The diagram below shows the AIXM classes, including the relevant data types, needed to encode that information:

Start Point & End Point

Route Segment ICAO defines a route segment as

...

ENR 3.1 (Lower ATS Routes):

  • upper and lower limits or minimum en-route altitudes.
  • minimum obstacle clearance altitudes;
  • Since en-route flights at or above the lowest usable flight level are flown at flight levels, it is suggested that these limits be expressed in flight levels (FL) whenever such flight levels are not likely to fall below the lowest safe altitude; otherwise, they should be expressed in altitude.

ENR 3.2 (Upper ATS Routes):

  • upper and lower limits (usually in flight levels "FL”).

ENR 3.3 (RNAV Routes):

  • upper and lower limits (usually in flight levels "FL”).

ENR 3.4 (Helicopter Routes):

  • upper and lower limits; minimum flight altitudes

ENR 3.5 (Other Routes):

  • No requirements stated regarding vertical limits.

The following table gives an overview which vertical limits are required by PANS-AIM for the AIP data set and the corresponding AIXM attributes of the RouteSegment class (Note 1):

Isn't acc. to Annex 11 the MOCA and the Minimum flight altitude for Routes?

Or is both the MEA and the MOCA considered as a kind of minimum flight altitude (see also change for ENR 3.1 Lower ATS routes?

The minimum flight altitudes determined shall provide a minimum clearance above the controlling obstacle located within the areas concerned.

PANS-AIMAIXM 5.1.1
Remarks
PropertyDefinition/DescriptionRelevanceAttributeDescription
Upper limitThe upper limit of the route segmentENR 3.1-3.4upperLimitThe vertical position of the route segment ceiling.


Lower LimitThe lower limit of the route segmentENR 3.1-3.4 (Note 2)lowerLimitThe vertical position of the route segment floor.


Note
titleNote 2

According to PANS-AIM for ENR 3.1 Lower ATS Route,

lower limits or minimum en-route altitudes

shall be defined.

In the "old" ICAO Annex 15 it was

lower limits or minimum flight altitudes


Minimum obstacle clearance altitude (MOCA)The minimum altitude for a defined segment of flight that provides the required obstacle clearance. minimumObstacleClearingAltitudeENR 3.1 Lower ATS RouteminimumObstacleClearanceAltitudeMinimum obstacle clearance altitude (MOCA). The minimum altitude for a defined segment of flight that provides the required obstacle clearance.

According to PANS-OPS

A MOCA is determined and published for each segment of the route.

In PANS-AIM it is only required for ENR 3.1 Lower ATS Routes.

The MOC value to be applied in the primary area for the en-route phase of an IFR flight is 300 m (1 000 ft) as a minimum.



Minimum en-route altitude (MEA)The altitude for an en-route segment that provides adequate reception of relevant navigation facilities and ATS communications, complies with the airspace structure and provides the required obstacle clearance.ENR 3.1 Lower ATS Route (Note 2)minimumEnrouteAltitudeMinimum en-route altitude (MEA). The altitude for an en-route segment that provides adequate reception of relevant navigation facilities and ATS communications, complies with the airspace structure and provides the required obstacle clearance.

According to PANS-OPS

The MEA is the greatest of:

  • the MOCA;
  • the minimum altitude for proper reception of the relevant facilities;
  • the minimum altitude for proper reception of ATS communications;
  • the minimum altitude that complies with the ATS structure.
Minimum flight altitudeMinimum flight altitudeENR 3.4 Helicopter routes???


According to PANS-AIM

The criteria used to determine minimum flight altitudes shall be provided in GEN 3.3.5.

In PANS-AIM the term is only used for "ENR 3.4
Warning
titleAIXM 5.1(.1) isseu

AIXM does not have a dedicated attribute for that purpose.


Info
titleOpen Question

Open Question

TBD: Is Minimum flight altitude the same as the MEA or MOCA for fixed wing but for helicopters? Is "Minimum flight altitude" defined somewhere?


Until clarified, mapped to MOCA.


minimumObstacleClearanceAltitude

According to PANS-AIM

The criteria used to determine minimum flight altitudes shall be provided in GEN 3.3.5.

In PANS-AIM the term is only used for "ENR 3.4 Helicopter routes"

ICAO Annex 11, 2.22 23 Minimum flight altitudes

Minimum flight altitudes shall be determined and promulgated by each Contracting State for each ATS route and control area over its territory. The minimum flight altitudes determined shall provide a minimum clearance above the controlling obstacle located within the areas concerned.

Info
titleOpen Question Minimum Flight Altitude
NANANAminimumCrossingAtEndThe lowermost vertical position at the end point, when flying on the route portion in the direction indicated in the RoutePortionUsage.


Warning
titleAIXM 5.1.1 issue

RoutePortionUsage is not defined in AIXM 5.1.1. If this attribute is related to the route portion, why is it part of the RouteSegment class?


NANANAmaximumCrossingAtEndThe uppermost vertical position at the end point, when flying on the route portion in the direction indicated in the RoutePortionUsage.Same issue as above.

...

More coding examples can be found in the AIXM DONLON AIP data set.

No.DescriptionXPath Expression

RSG-EX-01

RSG-EX-02

Route segment of Lower ATS route (incl.

DescriptionXPath ExpressionRSG-EX-01

  MEA)

Route segment of Lower ATS route

TBD(incl. MOCA)

//aixm:RouteSegmentTimeSlice[@gml:id='RSG_A6_BOR_ROB'] |

//aixm:RouteSegmentTimeSlice[@gml:id='RSG_A6_ROB_ROK'] |

RSG-EX-02Route segment of Upper ATS route//aixm:RouteSegmentTimeSlice[@gml:id='RSG_UA4_BARIM_WOB']
RSG-EX-03Route segment of RNAV route//aixm:RouteSegmentTimeSlice[@gml:id='RSG_UL123_ABOLA_ILURU']
RSG-EX-04Route segment of Helicpoter routeTBD

References