| Insert excerpt | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Excerpt |
|---|
This page captures discussion of the European Service Registry. |
| Table of Contents |
|---|
Current Service Registry
Discussion
Service Registry Concepts
federated and interconnected registries should be put in place
need some vision paper in the area dealing with e.g. with
federated and interconnected registries should be put in place - registry hierarchy
criterion criteria to determine if a service is to be published in a European, national or local registry
service discovery should be a feature, but it is really unclear to have concrete use cases in our operational ATM /AIM / ATFCM where we can demonstrate the need for service discovery
Service Registry Improvements
The responsiveness of the Registry can be improved. Sometime there is a delay when you click the ‘edit’ button.
There is a large degree of freedom when describing services. Harmonisation of entries through codelists may be good.
Technology
- What will be the technology to enable such a vision? Probably not all registry products are interoperable.
Quality of Content
- Compare further service descriptions from the MET community, identify similar services (HTTP, AMPQ) and evaluate commonalities/differences