Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Insert excerpt
Task Status
Task Status
nopaneltrue

Excerpt

This page captures discussion of the European Service Registry.

Info
Note: the decision making body is the Registry CCB.

Table of Contents

Current Service Registry

  • See: https://reference.swim.aero/registries.html
  • From Common Project 1: the registry, which must be used for publishing information about services, including service definitions that describe those aspects of a service that should be common among all implementations, such as standardised service specifications and implementation descriptions for providers

Discussion

Service Registry Concepts

  • need some vision paper in the area dealing with e.g.

  • federated and interconnected registries should be put in place - registry hierarchy

  • criteria to determine if a service is to be published in a European, national or local registry

  • service discovery should be a feature, but it is really unclear to have concrete use cases in our operational ATM /AIM / ATFCM where we can demonstrate the need for service discovery

Service Registry Improvements

  • The responsiveness of the Registry can be improved. Sometime there is a delay when you click the ‘edit’ button.

  • There is a large degree of freedom when describing services. Harmonisation of entries through codelists may be good.

Technology

Quality of Content

  • Compare further service descriptions from the MET community, identify similar  services (HTTP, AMPQ)  and evaluate commonalities/differences