| Insert excerpt | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Excerpt |
|---|
This page captures discussion of the European Service Registry. |
| Table of Contents |
|---|
| Info | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
•federated and interconnected registries should be put in place •need some vision paper in the area dealing e.g. with registry hierarchy •The responsiveness of the Registry can be improved. Sometime there is a delay when you click the ‘edit’ button. •There is a large degree of freedom when describing services. Harmonisation of entries through codelists may be good. •criterion to determine if a service is to be published in a European, national or local registry •service discovery should be a feature, but it is really unclear to have concrete use cases in our operational ATM /AIM / ATFCM where we can demonstrate the need for service discovery •What will be the technology to enable such a vision? Probably not all registry products are interoperable. •Compare further service descriptions from the MET community, identify similar services (HTTP, AMPQ) and evaluate commonalities/differences |