...
Expand |
---|
|
Panel |
---|
borderColor | lightgrey |
---|
bgColor | whitesmoke |
---|
borderStyle | dashed |
---|
| Title | Forms of semantic correspondence | Identifier | SWIM-INFO-014 | Requirement | A semantic correspondence shall be:- a mapping from a concept in the information definition to a concept or concepts in the AIRM; or
- a declaration that the concept in the information definition is out-of-scope of the AIRM; or
- a reference to a change request for the AIRM that intends to change the AIRM to cover the concept from the information definition; or
- a declaration that no semantic correspondence has been established for the concept.
| Rationale | This requirement ensures that the expression of semantic correspondence becomes verifiable. It allows gaps with the AIRM to be identified so that they can be managed. A reference to the change request is designed to allow an information definition to cause an evolution of the AIRM. | Verification | Completeness | Examples/Notes | Note: There are several methods for documenting a semantic correspondence. For example, this requirement can be satisfied in a tabular format using the unique identifier of the concept in the information definition and the unique identifier of the related AIRM concept. Semantic correspondences could also be represented using: - UML trace relationships; or
- metadata fields attached to the concept in the information definition that contains the unique identifier of the AIRM concept.
Example: The following is an example of a semantic correspondence written in tabbed-outline format. + concept: …name: Airspace …semantic correspondence: ……mapping: ………trace: urn:x-ses:sesarju:airm:v410:ConsolidatedLogicalDataModel:SubjectFields:AirspaceInfrastructure:Airspace:Airspace
Note: This requirement ensures that the documentation of semantic correspondence is complete. It is important to ensure that there are no gaps in the documentation as gaps are difficult to interpret. | Level of Implementation | Mandatory |
|
|
Guidance
The specification gives four types of semantic correspondence. The first of these is the best outcome of the semantic correspondence analysis:
...