Page Comparison

The list of rationales to use for an out-of-scope declaration is:

• container. This can be used for ‘concepts’ concepts that are merely structural elements and have no semantic value of their own
• messaging. This can be used when the concept contains information related to the message itself rather than the ATM information content of the message.
• network. This can be used when the concept contains information related to the network itself rather than the ATM information content of the message.
• system. This can be used when the concept contains information related to the system itself rather than the ATM information content of the message.
• non-atm. This can be used when the concept is not an ATM concept. For example, this could be human resource content or content concerning pricing at an airport. (This content may, of course, be covered by a separate ontology!)
• local. This can be used when the concept is local..? for internal use on a specific service.
• other. Any other text can be added when the rationale is not covered by the other categories.

The list of rationales to use for a no semantic correspondence established declaration is:

• information definition issue. This can be used when a problem has been identified in the information definition. An example of this is when there is a missing definition and it is therefore impossible to establish a correspondence. The problem cannot be resolved during the mapping exercise and it is not clear what the outcome of the resolution will be.
• incomplete mapping. This can be used when the mapping exercise has not been completed. In effect, it highlights areas where the mapping exercise is still to be performed.
• other. Any other text can be added when the rationale is not covered by the other categories.