Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
  • See: https://reference.swim.aero/registries.html
  • Insert excerpt
    Task Status
    Task Status
    nopaneltrue

    Excerpt

    This page captures discussion of the European Service Registry and the registry concept.

    Info

    Note: the decision making body is the Registry CCB.

    Table of Contents

    Current Service Registry

    Info

    From Common Project 1: the registry, which must be used for publishing information about services, including service definitions that describe those aspects of a service that should be common among all implementations, such as standardised service specifications and implementation descriptions for providers

    Discussion

    Table of Contents

    Service Registry

    Concepts
    • need some vision paper in the area dealing with e.g.

    • federated and interconnected registries should be put in place - registry hierarchy

    • criteria to determine if a service is to be published in a European, national or local registry

    • service discovery should be a feature, but it is really unclear to have concrete use cases in our operational ATM /AIM / ATFCM where we can demonstrate the need for service discovery

    Service Registry Improvements

    • The responsiveness of the Registry can be improved. Sometime there is a delay when you click the ‘edit’ button.

    • There is a large degree of freedom when describing services. Harmonisation of entries through codelists may be good.

    Technology

  • What will be the technology to enable such a vision? Probably not all registry products are interoperable.
  • Interaction with OGC's service discovery service (portalogcorg/files/?artifact_id=94391).

    Quality of Content

    Compare further service descriptions from the MET community, identify similar  services (HTTP, AMPQ)  and evaluate commonalities/differences

    Discussion

    At the moment there are no outstanding discussion points.