Versions Compared

Version Old Version 8 New Version 9
Changes made by

Former user

Former user

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.


Venue

Date: 11 Mar 2019  1400-1530

webex link: https://eurocontrol-conferences.webex.com/join/wvanhamm   |  706 775 248     

Agenda

Discuss CR ?5

ID

Title

startduration
1Welcome14:0010'
2Feedback from previous webex14:105'
3Update on tasksFinalise initial handbook14:1530'
4Finalise initial handbookReview the Donlon example14:453015'
5Update on other tasks15:0015'
6Next meetings15:2015105'
7Close15:3020-
Panel
borderColorlightgrey

Table of Contents
maxLevel2


Welcome

Objectives of this meeting are:

  • progress on the tasks
  • processing review comments
  • (publish first version of handbook)

Feedback from previous meeting

Action list

Short-term actions identified during 2019-01-28 SSCONE webex.

  • Webex moved from 22 to 23 Apr. 
  • F2F re-scheduled to 21-23 May.

Update on tasks

The task list is at SSCONE Tasks.

Task /wiki/spaces/SCOI/pages/59606295

TaskDescriptionStatusPriority
/wiki/spaces/SCOI/pages/59606295

Insert excerpt
Finalise initial handbook
Finalise initial handbook
nopaneltrue

  •  Action (all): provide review comments by 5/3/19
  •  processing comments

Comments received from: Sam and Oliver Krüger.

Comments are being processed. 

Proposed conclusion:

  • some pending questions
  • rework needed for service categories
  • update needed for XML example
  • Q: restrict acccess to some pages before publishing first version of the handbook.

outcome: 

Task /wiki/spaces/SCOI/pages/59606173

TaskDescriptionStatusPriority
/wiki/spaces/SCOI/pages/59606173

Insert excerpt
Review the Donlon example
Review the Donlon example
nopaneltrue

  •  Action (all): provide review comments by 5/3/19
  •  processing comments

Comments received from: Steffen Beringer and Oliver Krüger.

Comments are being processed

Proposed conclusion: 

  • conformance matrix added Conformance assessment - Donlon example
    • some elments missing (eg access and use conditions; eg code example)
  • reordering of section for better readability (eg business experts, developers)
    • Any suggestion?
  • Comment from Oliver K on use fo service...
    • helps to udnerstand what the specification requires
  • Any better example?

outcome: 

Task Conformance assessment

Task

Description

Status

Priority

/wiki/spaces/SCOI/pages/59605293 Insert excerptConformance assessmentConformance assessmentnopaneltrueyes

Agenda point for F2F (where someone from SWIM Governance Implementation Project will present the principles of SWIM Compliance)

Added example for Donlon: Conformance assessment - Donlon example.

outcome: 

Task /wiki/spaces/SCOI/pages/59606015

TaskDescriptionStatusPriority
/wiki/spaces/SCOI/pages/59606015

Insert excerpt
Process Change Request 168/1
Process Change Request 168/1
nopaneltrue

To be closed by next F2F.

Agenda point for F2F.

Main discussion point is probably to choose between these 2 options

option Aoption Boverall ideaThe Service Description specification should enforce AIRM conformance

It is not the role of the the Service Description specification to enforce AIRM conformance.

rationale

AIRM conformance is key to semantic interoperability.

Interoperability is an essential goal to achieve.

AIRM conformance is already enforced through the Information Definition specification.

Redundant requirements may be create confusion.

implicationConformance to the Service Description specification implies AIRM conformance.

Conformance to the Service Description specification does not imply AIRM conformance.

Conformance to the Information Definition specification implies AIRM conformance.

advice on handling CR

Change the specification.

see eg "revert back proposal"

Do not change the specification.update of handbook

Insist on AIRM conformance.

Make reference to change request and advice.

Insist on AIRM conformance.

Make clear that its enforcement is in the scope of the Information Definition specification.

  • either "Should the Service Description specification enforce AIRM conformance"
    • or "Should AIRM conformance enforcement beshould AIRM conformance is this fully

    Added a table of discussion points about the 2 options. The main point fo discussion being: which SWIM specification should enforce the AIRM conformance.

    outcome: 

    Task Conformance assessment

    Task

    Description

    Status

    Priority

    /wiki/spaces/SCOI/pages/59605293


    Insert excerpt
    Conformance assessment
    Conformance assessment
    nopaneltrue


    		yes

    Agenda point for F2F (where someone from SWIM Governance Implementation Project will present the principles of SWIM Compliance)

    Added example for Donlon: Conformance assessment - Donlon example.

    outcome: 

    Any other business

    Use of specifications

    Questions:

    • Progress on use of the spec?
    • Difficulties encountered?
    • Examples to be shared, or to work on?

    Next meetings

    Meeting schedule is maintained at SSCONE Meetings.
    Next Webex on Tu 23 Apr 14:00.

    Combined F2F with SITCOM 21-23 May. With SSCONE day on 23 May 0900-1600.

    • ==Q: and possible that SWIM-TEC ??participates as well
    • Question: someone interested in presenting something? In sharing experience?
      • Eg MET-GATE project?
    • Agenda points == (make visible the existing page)

    Close meeting