Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Panel
borderColorblack
borderStyledashed
Excerpt

This section describes the use cases related the eFPL usage by ANSPs.

Table of Contents
maxLevel1
absoluteUrltrue
typeflat
separatorpipe

Warning
titleStatus
WORK IN PROGRESS - content should not be used







Panel
titleFull table of contents

Table of Contents
absoluteUrltrue

Use

of eFPL for Visualisation

Case categories

CategoryGeneral Description
Several items of
VisualisationThis category covers UCs whereby the eFPL
can be
content is displayed to various actors in an ACC
for enhancing their situational awareness and satisfying additional information needs.
  1. Use of the eFPL data as an analysis tool – for learning purposes and training
  2. Visualisation of eFPL data as a Fall back mechanism, should the system encounter failure
  3. Visualisation of eFPL data enabling to perform ATC even when radar contact has been lost (Lack of contact with AU, procedural separation mechanisms)

Relevant eFPL content

These items include:

  • Agreed 4D Trajectory
  • Unconstrained Trajectory
Note

To be clarified: is this the desired trajectory captured in the filed eFPL, or the performance profile, which a zero-wind, standard atmosphere profile reflective of the flight capabilities and desired parameters.

  • Trajectory Change Points (TCP)
  • FPL2012 Field 15

Actors

  • Flight Data Assistant
  • Flow Manager
  • Supervisor
  • Coordination Controller
  • Executive Controller

Use of eFPL for Flow Management (Traffic Complexity Tools)

General Description

The information of the eFPL can be Use of eFPL data in
(e.g. Flight Data Assistant, Flow Manager, Supervisor, Coordination Controller, Executive Controller) for enhancing their situational awareness and satisfying additional information needs.
Flow ManagementThis category covers UCs whereby the eFPL content is used in Flow- and Complexity Tools in order to improve the quality of the respective forecasts and the related planning for sector configurations and staff allocation.
Info
Quote from ICAO FF-ICE Guidance Material, Section “Implementation Strategy”
By taking the first step of accepting FF-ICE flight plans through the filing service, ASPs would gain access to more detailed trajectory information. This would be useful for strategic traffic flow management purposes, at the same time allowing ASPs to explore/develop other capabilities made possible by the additional trajectory information. ASPs will be able to gain experience in using the trajectory information and hence better build up their system capabilities for information processing, ……

Relevant eFPL content

  • Take-off Mass ( Would be used in EFD)

  • Performance data: performance profile, speed schedule ( Would be used in EFD)

  • Agreed 4D Trajectory

  • Trajectory Change Points (TCP)

  • FPL2012 Field 15

Actors

  • Flow Manager

  • Supervisor

Core ATC system
(FDPS)

General Description

The information of the eFPL can be
This category covers UCs whereby the eFPL content is used in various components of the core ATS-System, where flight plan information is used and needed. The mainly affected component would be the Flight Data Processing System (FDPS), but also other components could benefit directly or indirectly from eFPL information, e.g. Arrival Management Systems and Conflict Detection Tools

Relevant eFPL content

  • Take-off Mass:
    • Displaying the take-off mass to the ATCO with an indication whether this is considered heavy for such A/C type could give an indication on whether some ROCD can be made or not, without the ATCO having to ask, thus saving frequency time.
      • As an example, A320 is categorised as ”medium” but could be an actual ”heavy”
    • as input to the local trajectory computation
  • Performance data: 
    • Performance profile
    • Speed schedule
  • Agreed 4D Trajectory
  • Trajectory Change Points (TCP)
    • In today's operations, ANSP systems commonly ignore, or make assumptions on, level constraints and “clip them out”. This operationally leads to (1) clearances instructed by the ATCO (e.g. instructs FL350, while the clipped out level was FL300) and (2) sometimes intruders to our next partner. Especially if we know levels because of regulations, situation (2) would no longer occur. The information about the reason why a level constraint is present in the trajectory (for instance, PTR or regulation) will help avoid (2)
  • FPL2012 Field 15

    Actors

  • Supervisor
  • Coordination Controller
  • Executive Controller








    Use of the distributed eFPL by an ANSP

    The data contained in the eFPL can be used by an ANSP in different ways:

    ATC related

    • Several items of an eFPL can be displayed to various actors in an ACC (Flight Data Assistant, Flow Manager, Supervisor, Coordination Controller, Executive Controller) for enhancing their situational awareness and satisfying additional information needs. For instance:
      • Use of the eFPL data as an analysis tool – for learning purposes and training
      • Visualisation of eFPL data as a Fall back mechanism, should the system encounter failure
      • Visualisation of eFPL data enabling to perform ATC even when radar contact has been lost (Lack of contact with AU, procedural separation mechanisms)
    • The eFPL can be used in various components of the core ATS-System, where flight plan information is used and needed. The mainly affected component would be the Flight Data Processing System (FDPS), but also other components could benefit directly or indirectly from eFPL information, e.g. Arrival Management Systems and Conflict Detection Tools.

    ATFM related

    • The information of the eFPL can be used in Flow- and Complexity Tools in order to improve the quality of the respective forecasts and the related planning for sector configurations and staff allocation, as acknowledged in the ICAO FF-ICE Implementation Guidance Manual, Section “Implementation Strategy”
      • By taking the first step of accepting FF-ICE flight plans through the filing service, ASPs would gain access to more detailed trajectory information. This would be useful for strategic traffic flow management purposes, at the same time allowing ASPs to explore/develop other capabilities made possible by the additional trajectory information. ASPs will be able to gain experience in using the trajectory information and hence better build up their system capabilities for information processing, …


    The following table provides 

    Overview


    Content of
    the distributed eFPL

    Use Cases
    Data CategoryData Item
    Flight IdentificationGUFI (blue star)
    Aircraft Identification
    Flight Status

    Operator Flight Plan Version (blue star)
    Revalidation Status (blue star)
    Revalidation Status Explanation (blue star)
    Flight Characteristics







    Flight Rules
    Type of Flight
    Special Handling
    Flight Plan Originator
    Remarks
    Operator
    Equipment and Capabilities
    Supplementary Information Source
    Required Runway Visual Range
    Aircraft Characteristics






    Total number of aircraft
    Registration
    Aircraft Address
    SELCAL Code
    Mode A Code
    Number and type of aircraft
    Wake Turbulence Category
    Aircraft Approach Category
    Departure/Destination Data





    Departure Aerodrome
    Destination Aerodrome
    Estimated Off-Block Time
    Departure Airport Slot Identification (blue star)
    Destination Airport Slot Identification (blue star)
    Departure Runway (blue star)
    Destination Runway (blue star)
    Alternates

    Alternate Destination Aerodrome(s)
    Alternate Take-Off Aerodrome(s)
    Alternate En-Route Aerodrome(s)
    Desired Route/Trajectory (blue star)
    Agreed Route/Trajectory (blue star)Display of the Agreed Route/Trajectory to the ATCO when radar contact has been lost
               Route/Traj. Group


    Aircraft Take-off Mass (blue star)

    Processing of the Aircraft Take-off Mass by the FDPS

    Display of the Aircraft Take-off Mass to the ATCO

    Requested Cruising Speed
    Requested Cruising Level
    Total Estimated Elapsed Time
    General Flight Constraint (blue star)
             Route/Traj. Element

















    Along Route Distance (blue star)
    Route Element Start Point
    Route to Next Element
    Modified Route Indicator (blue star)
    Route Truncation Indicator (blue star)
    Requested Change
    Route/Trajectory Constraints (blue star)
    Trajectory Point (blue star)
                Geo Position (blue star)
                Time (blue star)
                Predicted Airspeed (blue star)
                Predicted Ground Speed (blue star)
                Wind Vector (blue star)
                Assumed Altimeter Setting (blue star)
                Temperature (blue star)
                Trajectory Point Property (blue star)
                Weight at 4D Point (blue star)
    Planned Delay
              Route/Traj. Aircraft PerformancePerformance Profile (blue star)Processing of the Performance Profile by the FDPS
    Speed Schedule (blue star)Processing of the Speed Schedule by the FDPS
    Route to Revised DestinationRevised Destination
    Route String to Revised Destination
    Dangerous GoodsDangerous Goods Information (blue star)
    AIRACAIRAC Reference (blue star)
    Supplementary InformationFuel Endurance
    Persons on Board
    Emergency Radio
    Survival Capability
    Life Jacket Characteristics
    Aircraft Colour and Markings
    Pilot in Command
    Dinghies
    Remarks
    Other European ItemsRoute Text
    Ifps Identifier
    Stay Information
    AO What-If ReRoute Indicator
    Replacement Flight Plan Indicator








    Use cases descriptions

    Processing of the Aircraft Take-off Mass for trajectory computation

    Expand
    NameProcessing of the Aircraft Take-off Mass by the FDPS
    Category
    Actors

    Main: ANSP FDPS

    Other: NM Publication Service

    Preconditions
    • the NM Publication Service is consumed by the ANSP
    • the Take-Off Mass is provided by the AU in the filed eFPL
    • the Take-Off Mass provided in the filed eFPL is shared by NM in the distributed eFPL
    Trigger

    A distributed eFPL containing a Take-Off Mass is received by the ANSP.

    Description

    A take-off mass is received. It is used by the FDPS as a replacement of the current parameter (e.g. as a replacement of a static adapted BADA parameter).

    ...


    Display of the Aircraft Take-off Mass to the ATCO

    Expand
    NameDisplay of the Aircraft Take-off Mass to the ATCO
    Category
    Actors

    Main: ATCO, ANSP

    Other: NM Publication Service

    Preconditions
    • the NM Publication Service is consumed by the ANSP
    • the Take-Off Mass and the Type of Aircraft are provided by the AU in the filed eFPL
    • the Take-Off Mass and the Type of Aircraft provided in the filed eFPL are shared by NM in the distributed eFPL
    Trigger

    A distributed eFPL containing a Take-Off Mass and the Type of Aircraft is received by the ANSP.

    Description

    A Take-Off Mass and a Type of Aircraft are received. The Take-Off Mass is displayed to the ATCO with an indication whether this is considered heavy for such an Type of Aircraft or not.

    The ATCO can use this information to directly evaluate whether some rate of climb/descent can be made or not, without having to ask, thus saving frequency time.

    ...

    Processing of the Performance Profile by the FDPS

    Expand
    NameProcessing of the Performance Profile by the FDPS
    Category
    Actors

    Main: ANSP FDPS

    Other: NM Publication Service

    Preconditions
    • the NM Publication Service is consumed by the ANSP
    • the Performance Profile is provided by the AU in the filed eFPL
    • the Performance Profile provided in the filed eFPL is shared by NM in the distributed eFPL
    • the Performance Profile provided in the distributed eFPL is received by the ANSP
    Trigger

    A distributed eFPL contaning a Performance Profile is received by the ANSP.

    Description

    A performance profile is received. It is composed of a climb profile and a descent profile, both expressed as a sequence of profile points each containing: distance, time duration, flight level or altitude, and optionally the true airspeed.

    Upon receipt, the climb and descent profiles are compared with the relevant departure and arrival portions of the FDPS local trajectory assuming zero-wind, standard atmosphere and no constraint.

    This comparison produces correction factors (in distance, time, level, speed...) that can be subsequently applied by the FDPS during the trajectory computation, as appropriate.

    ...

    Processing of the Speed Schedule by the FDPS

    Expand
    NameProcessing of the Speed Schedule by the FDPS
    Category
    Actors

    Main: ANSP FDPS

    Other: NM Publication Service

    Preconditions
    • the NM Publication Service is consumed by the ANSP
    • the Speed Schedule is provided by the AU in the filed eFPL
    • the Speed Schedule provided in the filed eFPL is shared by NM in the distributed eFPL
    Trigger

    A distributed eFPL containing a Speed Schedule is received by the ANSP.

    Description(warning) TODO
    ...

    Display of the Agreed Route/Trajectory to the ATCO when radar contact has been lost

    Expand
    NameDisplay of the Agreed Route/Trajectory to the ATCO when radar contact has been lost
    Category
    Actors

    Main: ATCO, ANSP

    Other: NM Publication Service

    Preconditions
    • the NM Publication Service is consumed by the ANSP
    • the Agreed Route/Trajectory is shared by NM in the distributed eFPL
    • The distributed eFPL containing an Agreed Route/Trajectory is received by the ANSP
    TriggerRadar contact is lost with the flight
    Description

    The agreed route/trajectory is displayed to the ATCO when radar contact is lost. This enables the ATCO to keep performing ATC and apply the appropriate procedural separation mechanisms.

    ...








    Expand
    titleWork Area / Old content

    Use of eFPL for Visualisation

    General Description

    Several items of the eFPL can be displayed to various actors in an ACC for enhancing their situational awareness and satisfying additional information needs.

    1. Use of the eFPL data as an analysis tool – for learning purposes and training
    2. Visualisation of eFPL data as a Fall back mechanism, should the system encounter failure
    3. Visualisation of eFPL data enabling to perform ATC even when radar contact has been lost (Lack of contact with AU, procedural separation mechanisms)

    Relevant eFPL content

    These items include:

    • Agreed 4D Trajectory
    • Unconstrained Trajectory
    Note

    To be clarified: is this the desired trajectory captured in the filed eFPL, or the performance profile, which a zero-wind, standard atmosphere profile reflective of the flight capabilities and desired parameters.

    • Trajectory Change Points (TCP)
    • FPL2012 Field 15

    Actors

    • Flight Data Assistant
    • Flow Manager
    • Supervisor
    • Coordination Controller
    • Executive Controller

    Use of eFPL for Flow Management (Traffic Complexity Tools)

    General Description


    The information of the eFPL can be used in Flow- and Complexity Tools in order to improve the quality of the respective forecasts and the related planning for sector configurations and staff allocation.


    Info
    Quote from ICAO FF-ICE Guidance Material, Section “Implementation Strategy”
    By taking the first step of accepting FF-ICE flight plans through the filing service, ASPs would gain access to more detailed trajectory information. This would be useful for strategic traffic flow management purposes, at the same time allowing ASPs to explore/develop other capabilities made possible by the additional trajectory information. ASPs will be able to gain experience in using the trajectory information and hence better build up their system capabilities for information processing, ……

    Relevant eFPL content

    • Take-off Mass ( Would be used in EFD)

    • Performance data: performance profile, speed schedule ( Would be used in EFD)

    • Agreed 4D Trajectory

    • Trajectory Change Points (TCP)

    • FPL2012 Field 15

    Actors

    • Flow Manager

    • Supervisor

    Use of eFPL data in Core ATC system (FDPS)

    General Description

    The information of the eFPL can be used in various components of the core ATS-System, where flight plan information is used and needed. The mainly affected component would be the Flight Data Processing System (FDPS), but also other components could benefit directly or indirectly from eFPL information, e.g. Arrival Management Systems and Conflict Detection Tools

    Relevant eFPL content

    • Take-off Mass:
      • Displaying the take-off mass to the ATCO with an indication whether this is considered heavy for such A/C type could give an indication on whether some ROCD can be made or not, without the ATCO having to ask, thus saving frequency time.
        • As an example, A320 is categorised as ”medium” but could be an actual ”heavy”
      • as input to the local trajectory computation
    • Performance data: 
      • Performance profile
      • Speed schedule
    • Agreed 4D Trajectory
    • Trajectory Change Points (TCP)
      • In today's operations, ANSP systems commonly ignore, or make assumptions on, level constraints and “clip them out”. This operationally leads to (1) clearances instructed by the ATCO (e.g. instructs FL350, while the clipped out level was FL300) and (2) sometimes intruders to our next partner. Especially if we know levels because of regulations, situation (2) would no longer occur. The information about the reason why a level constraint is present in the trajectory (for instance, PTR or regulation) will help avoid (2)
    • FPL2012 Field 15

    Actors

    • Supervisor
    • Coordination Controller
    • Executive Controller