...
Title | Change Proposal | Justification | Status | Notes | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Update definition | Update Definitions page to include the different types of data sets. This can be a note in the ICAO data set entry.
| The obstacle data set has different requirements from the others so needs to be defined on its own. | Open | The different metadata requirements can be found at Basic properties for obstacles. | |||||||||
2 | Change wording of DS-META-007 - Geographical extent of the data set on Metadata Requirements | Reword the requirement into two clauses:
The new wording will be reflected on Requirement 7_ Geographical extent of the data set. | The obstacle data set makes "Area of coverage" mandatory. The tidy up of the table will ensure it is inline with the requirement/recommendation. | Open | ||||||||||
3 | Change the list of geographical elements to include. | The introduction on Requirement 7_ Geographical extent of the data set should become:
The Obligation / Condition row in tables should become:
| Reflects decision to concentrate on the provision of GeographicalDescription but allow the provision of other elements if available. | Open | ||||||||||
4 | New requirement for obstacle data sets covering integrity. | Add definition to Definitions:
Add new requirement to Minimal Metadata Requirements:
Add dedicated page with guidance. The table will use lineage. Of note: Implementing Instruction When adding the lineage statement state whether critical, essential or routine data integrity level is assured. Example encoding
Update Appendix B_ Complete Informative Example to reflect the guidance. | See Basic properties for obstacles. | Open | Are the levels:
What figure is expected in the metadata e.g.
See notes below. Decision was to use lineage and the levels (critical, essential, routine) to fulfill the requirement. Obstacle data is routine so that is used in the guidance. | |||||||||
5 | Rename Requirement 7_ Geographical extent of the data set, etc. | The page name should be updated to e.g. DS-META-007 - Geographical extent of the data set. This change should be applied to all the individual requirements pages. | The word "requirement" can be misleading. It is better simply to use the identifier. | Open | ||||||||||
6 | Update Appendix A_ Requirements Analysis to reflect final version of Annex 15 and PANS-AIM | Check the paragraph numbers used. Add the obstacle data set metadata requirements. Updated numbers should be reflected on Minimal Metadata Requirements as well. | Mostly tidy up. | Open | ||||||||||
7 | Update trace for Requirement 7_ Geographical extent of the data set on the Metadata Requirements page. | The requirement is traceable to PANS-AIM Table A6-2. Obstacle attributes for the obstacle data sets | The obstacle data set makes "Area of coverage" mandatory. | Open | ||||||||||
8 | Update guidance on | Update Add guidance to clarify what is meant by validity in this case .
| Open | |||||||||||
9 | Change the order of the two examples on Requirement 3_ Validity of the data set | Change the order of the examples as the "End date unknown" is the more usual case. | Implemented | |||||||||||
10 | Add Requirement 0_How to Provide Metadata to Metadata Requirements list | Add Requirement 0_How to Provide Metadata to Metadata Requirements list as it is currently not there. | Open |
...