• Questions to be addressed:
  • How do I describe a service that uses GraphQL?
  • If you have ideas please send them to the group.

• The existing comments were reviewed and the pages will be updated accordingly.
• Comments made during the meeting will be added to the pages.
• The comments are of different natures:
  
  • ensuring proper documentation in a service description
  • ensuring harmonised design/implementation

Design/Implementation comments

• The group discussed the best approach to the service design/implementation related comments.
  
  • The current pages will be refactored to reflect the difference in the comments.
  • At the next meeting we can decide if we want, e.g., a section called "supporting service activities" or to cover the comments as part of service definition work.
• Other inputs to review:
  • 20191104 Controlled verbs for Application Functions V.1.1.pdf was made available.
  • ISRM -  https://www.sesarju.eu/sites/default/files/documents/transversal/08.03.10_D45_ISRM_Modelling_Guidelines.docx. 
• The group should review these to see how best to use them.

High-level architecture

• The group pointed out that AMQP, WFS, REST, etc. can

• be used by the same service. For example, an AMQP message may contain a link to data to be accessed over WFS. There may be a need to build some guidance on how to document these composite services (e.g. as different interfaces in the same service).